What’s New

PH NatCom joins Baguio’s newest Creative Arts Festival

Opening Message of Secretary General Lila Ramos Shahani during the opening of ENTACool: 2018 Baguio Creative Festival last 10 November 2018 Naimbag nga rabii, naglaing kayo amin! Undersecretary Edwin Enrile, Tourism Promotions Board COO Venus Tan, CCP Chairperson Margie Moran, Benguet Governor Cresencio Pacalso, Congressman Mark Go, Mayor Mauricio Domogan, Laida Lim, artists, heritage workers, and the people of Baguio, ladies and gentlemen, good evening. I am thrilled to be back in Baguio, the Philippines’ first UNESCO Creative City! As I said during the launch of the Creative City title last February, “I remember being fresh from university graduation in 1989 and joining the CCP’s Museo ng Kalinangang Pilipino for my first job. During my stint with the CCP, we came up to Baguio to attend the famous Baguio Arts Festival, which eventually put Baguio on the world map. While at the Festival, I met and interacted with artists like Roberto Villanueva, Santi Bose, Kidlat Tahimik, Ben Cab, Willy Magtibay, Laida Lim, Katrin de Guia, Tommy Hafalla and many others — all of whom were the lifeblood of that breathtaking festival. Indeed, the gifted and iconic Baguio Arts Guild left a deep impression on me. It was my first time to experience that ethereal feeling of being here, surrounded by the lush green environment that the people of Baguio call home — with its Igorot culture and vibrant arts community — many of whom remain dear friends to this day. “So when UNESCO designated Baguio a Creative City, I was genuinely thrilled by the news, although not at all surprised. Baguio is, and always has been, a world-class Creative City.” Tatlong dekada na po kini-kilala and mga manlilikha dito sa Baguio ng buong mundo!    Sadly, for many complex reasons, the Baguio Arts Festival was not able to sustain itself. Some of those reasons were structural, some partisan, and some purely organizational, such as the financial demands of sponsoring international festivals annually and sustaining the organization itself. The artists, as many of them have told me, were busy multi-tasking: organizing the festival, raising funds, promoting it here and abroad, curating the international participants, organizing logistics, AND — on top of all that — finishing their own art works in time for opening day. That was no small accomplishment for this band of talented Baguio folk. Naturally, they were worn out and felt they needed more institutional support. It seems that Panagbenga, while colorful and beautiful in its own way — although infinitely more commercial — has become more of a priority for the local community. But it should be remembered that Baguio got the UNESCO Creative City designation not because of Panagbenga, but because of its unique confluence of Cordillera-influenced crafts and folk art — specifically, woodwork, silverwork, and weaving. There have also been artist-run efforts, such as the 2011 AXIS Art Project and the 2015 Markets of Resistance. And we cannot overlook private initiatives resulting in numerous creative centers, like the BenCab Museum, the Maryknoll Ecological Sanctuary, Victor Oteyza Community Art Space, Tam-awan Village, Easter Weaving Room, Narda’s Handicrafts, the Ili Likha Artists Wateringhole, Asin Woodcarvers Village, and Café by the Ruins — all hubs of creativity energized by a sheer love for culture and the arts. How could UNESCO not choose Baguio as a Creative City over other contending cities? There is here what UNESCO calls a “creative economy”— a synergy of artistic sectors generating local business enterprises. Few cities have this endowment because — since the Americans created this hill station in Benguet — Baguio has become a conjunction of rich Igorot culture, on the one hand, and artistic cosmopolitanism, on the other. Finally, it is the home of two National Artists, my old friends Kidlat Tahimik and Ben Cab. All these swirling energies have contributed to making Baguio a UNESCO Creative City. So I am delighted anew that Chancellor Ray Rovillos and Tourism Promotions Board Head Director Venus Tan — and the many enterprising communities in Baguio — have once again been able to resuscitate a creative Baguio festival this year. But what, you might ask, is the value of a UNESCO designation anyway? If it doesn’t come with a cash gift, why does it even matter? Vigan’s World Heritage status is a good example of how investments can result from a UNESCO inscription. Since its World Heritage listing, significantly more investments have been made in basic infrastructure there. Prior to inscription in 1999, Vigan was merely a 2nd class municipality with an annual revenue of P27 million. After inscription, Vigan’s leaders came up with an action plan to transform the town into a thriving community with productive citizens and a more distinct identity. From a staggering unemployment rate of 45% in 1995, the city’s jobless population is now down to less than 8%. The city’s annual revenue has also increased more than 12 times since 1995. A UNESCO listing can thus help create a nexus of local and national government, international NGO activity and private sector involvement. Not to mention the international prestige that comes with such a listing. But there is also a dark side to being part of this prestigious list: hardly a year goes by that my office doesn’t become involved in some potential UNESCO de-listing or danger listing of one site or another. Yes, sites have been known to be deemed endangered by UNESCO or removed from the list altogether. This happens when the local government and the community do not sustain, protect and nurture — in short: take responsibility for and invest in — the creative environment that led to the UNESCO designation in the first place. So how do we make sure that the UNESCO designation of this beloved city doesn’t go up in smoke at some later point in time? After all, to ask artists and craftspeople on their own to not only create and curate, but also to finance, the arts community as a whole (as the Baguio Arts Guild had done in the 80s,) is not only

UNESCO holds Ethics Teachers’ Training Course in Manila

Last 06 August 2018, UNESCO and Ateneo de Manila University hosted a week-long Teachers' Training Course on Ethics here in Manila. Many scholars presided, including Dean Jonathan Chua and Dr. Rainier Ibana of Ateneo De Manila University, Dr. Zosimo Lee of University of the Philippines and three foreign scholars specializing in Bioethics – Dr. Bert Gordijn from Ireland, Dr. Marie-Genevieve Pinsart from Belgium, and Dr. Mohammed Firdaus Bin Abdul Aziz from Malaysia. PH NatCom Secretary General Lila Ramos Shahani opened the ceremonies. Excerpts from her speech: "Today we come together to discuss a field that is at once controversial and deeply fraught. My own forays into the complexity of bioethics begin with a harrowing personal story. It is about the end-of-life issues that were raised during my Mom’s final month with us on this planet. Her stage four colon cancer had progressed to her liver, lymph nodes and lungs. Afflicted with pneumonia, she was too ill to be treated with chemotherapy. "Tragically, she never left a medical directive indicating which end-of-life treatments were acceptable to her and which were not. Eventually, as she slipped into a near-stupor (hot tears streaming down her cheeks), my two brothers and I had to make some terrible decisions: do we intubate her when she obviously hates the tube and keeps trying to pull it out, forcing the doctors to put her in uncomfortable restraints? Do we do cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on her when she already has advanced osteoporosis and is likely to have cracked ribs as a result? Will she be able to withstand the pain of electric shock? "The doctors were divided and, frankly, of little help (in the end, none of them even bothered to attend her wake). My brothers and I, too, were divided. They wanted to do everything humanly possible to keep her alive at all costs and I wanted to let her go. My instincts were telling me that she just wanted to rest. After all, she was too ill for chemotherapy and therefore the cancer was progressing anyway. But, in the end, she died of low blood pressure – taking the decision-making entirely out of our hands. "The question I kept asking myself throughout was: when does a human life expire – in substance, in meaning and in spirit? Is life itself more important than the dignity and well-being of that very life? "These are examples of bioethical concerns that have affected me personally. But what exactly is bioethics as a field? Bioethics is a study of ethical issues that arise from the intersection of biology and medicine. It introduces the question of moral discernment in medical policy and practice, and asks about the relationship between and among life sciences, biotechnology, medicine, politics, law and philosophy. It includes debates on the boundaries of life (such as abortion and euthanasia), surrogacy, health care, the right to refuse medical care, cloning, gene therapy, human genetic engineering and human experimentation. "From the Hippocratic Oath ('Do No Harm') during Antiquity to the heated ethical debates that characterized the 1970s, we can trace the rise of a field that in turn spurred the development of numerous sub-disciplines. "Indeed, it has been suggested that bioethics grew out of a critical reaction in the US to 19th and 20th century experimentations on human subjects, often performed illegally and without their consent, and often funded by the US government. As early as the 1840s, gynecological experiments without anesthesia were performed on Black American women. Indeed, American history is studded with such examples: the whooping cough virus; US Navy pathogens of pneumonia in San Francisco; the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments; and, after WWII, 400 secret and classified experiments on Black infants. More recently, the CIA has conducted experiments on prisoners and the mentally challenged, exposing them to fear, pain and sexual abuse. "But this is not to suggest that these sinister activities took place only in the United States. Surely there are no more egregious examples than the Nazi experiments on Jews in Europe or Japan’s Unit 731’s experiments on prisoners of war during World War II. It is simply to observe that the resistance to these practices – and the rise of bioethics as a field – can be traced to the US. "Here in the Philippines, the debates around family planning (what we call "reproductive health"), abortion and the drug war remain sharp and intense. "These are tensions that exist the world over. Indeed, Bioethics can be seen as implicit in the ideas behind the formation of the United Nations in the wake of WWII and certainly explicit in parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "To the extent that bioethics involves framing debates about proper care and treatment of all that exists in the world, it will necessarily be engaged with questions of power and politics. In other words, the bioethical will inevitably involve what Michel Foucault and others have called the biopolitical. The latter entails contemporary modes of governance whereby the State seems to shape the development of lives both on the individual, as well as on the most general, levels. "This includes such things as creating public health policies and regulating carcinogens, food supplies, water purity and reproductive health--areas that have a direct impact on the population as a whole. In order to do this, biopolitical governance must rely on scientific and medical experts. At the same time, biopolitics, to be effective, must invest in the continuing research and development of infrastructures, institutions and practices that promote the life of its population. This is precisely why the biopolitical involves defining and governing life itself… "So, following Foucault, who, then, had the power to make decisions about my Mom -- her doctors or her children? In our case, we were asked to make a decision. After all, the medical establishment -- the medium through which biopower is generally coursed -- tends to favor keeping the patient alive above all else. I, on the other hand, wanted to free her from the terrible imprisonment

Forum on the Filipino Youth and Violent Extremism

PH NatCom organized an exhilarating forum on "Filipino Youth and Violent Extremism in the Digital Age" last 19-20 July 2018. Looking at the causes and evolution of extremism in this country, PH NatCom led the discussion on the vulnerabilities of Filipino youth to the harsh realities around them, particularly in social media. Secretary General Lila Ramos Shahani opened the discussion by reflecting upon how violent extremism does not exist in a socio-cultural, economic or political vacuum. "Rather, it is part of a complex, incremental continuum that is at once a resistance to -- just as it is deeply imbricated within -- state power. In the case of Marawi, we can trace its roots to as far back as the American colonial occupation of Mindanao and subsequent attempts by the post-colonial government to integrate Moro polities into the Republic. While some Moro elites were successful in using the state to further their local power, many others were neglected by (and therefore tended to regard) the state as a colonial power. Furthermore, the social importance of families and clans created conditions for the emergence of warlords and other strong men who have tended to use violence as a way of furthering their power. So: the combination of state and local violence, and the construction of socio-political relations have set the conditions for what we might consider to be violent extremism. In the case of Marawi, one of the immediate causes for the eruption of war was the failure to enact the BBL during the Aquino administration due to resistance among certain Congressional elites, many of whom were members of the Mindanao settler elite. Prior to the failure of the BBL, other events also set the stage for the Maute uprising, such as the siege of Zamboanga and the Mamasapano fiasco. It's important to note, however, that the war in Marawi was enabled by what seemed to be a remarkable flow of cash and arms. So what, then, of what Francisco Pancho Lara calls ‘shadow economies’? Give the weakness of state institutions, these shadow economies play an inordinate role in providing economic opportunities, livelihoods and the accumulation of political power on the part of those who seek to challenge the government. But is this not ultimately part and parcel of state formation in a post-colonial era, I wonder? Is the larger chain of events not brought about by similarly-intersecting global forces -- a long history of violent conflict driven by colonial occupation and capitalist exploitation, weak institutions that become prey to strong men, an underserved population available for recruitment to various causes, and the workings of a shadow economy characterized by the illicit cross-border flows of money, arms, drugs, goods and people?” PH NatCom and the youth participants were privileged to have as their guest speakers, Ms. Amina Rasul and Mr. Richard Heydarian. Ms. Rasul gave a searing critique of the Philippine state since the Marcos years, seen from the perspective of Mindanaoans. Why, she asked, are only Muslims seen as violent extremists? What about Buddhists, Christians, Jews, Hindus and indigenous peoples -- all of whom have arguably been complicit in xenophobic behavior at some point in human history? Mr. Heydarian gave an excellent analysis of the youth bulge in this country and elsewhere, citing the factors that lead to radicalization: economic, socio-cultural and political grievances; fundamentalist ideology; and the capacity to mobilize. The discussions were passionate and earnest, with young people from all walks of life (the police, military, civil society, NGOs, academics, media personnel) weighing in. So where does this leave us now, as the BBL is just about to be signed? In view of how Martial Law decimated infrastructures in Mindanao during the Marcos years; FVR's focus on MNLF and Nur Misuari; Erap's all-out war on the region; GMA's complicity with Moro elites like the Ampatuans; PNoy's preference for the MILF over the MNLF; and the normalization of Nur Misuari/MNLF's status during the Duterte administration, in the wake of the Zamboanga siege -- how representative is this current incarnation of the BBL of different sectors in the region, and to what extent are young people's voices represented? Secretary General Shahani ended by pointing out that we all need to be wary of a discourse that pits "us" versus "them," as if the problem only lies in conflict-related areas and only "they" need to be changed. In the Philippines, Muslims are not the only problem: Christians -- and imperial Manila -- are deeply responsible as well. She added that in the field of education, it is not enough to teach Muslim Filipinos about themselves, we also need to teach the mainstream majority (the Catholic, Tagalog and English speaking cultural hegemonies) about these minorities so that we do not Orientalize them.  To close her speech, she asked, “But what about social media, which often goes well beyond the purview of the state? Is it not time to show positive and empowering messages of Mindanaoans to challenge existing tropes and stereotypes about violent Muslim men and passive Muslim women?”

PH NatCom joins Youth GenFest

PH NatCom joined an exhilarating meeting of 7,000 youth delegates from over 53 countries, all speaking over 16 languages. This was during the Youth GenFest from 06-08 July 2018 in Tagaytay City. The Foccolare Movement, established by Chiara Lubich, a UNESCO Peace Awardee, is impressive. This Catholic movement is not only about personal redemption but about a collective move among the youth towards world peace. The gathering engaged youth delegates to discuss Life Directions of the Self, Social Responsibility, Global Citizenship, Inter-religious Dialogue, Entrepreneurship, Social Media, and Ecology. PH NatCom Secretary General was chosen by the Focolare Movement to be the keynote speaker. She pointed out that these were not discrete and distinct narratives. Instead, they are inextricably linked -- almost like concentric rings. Because young people are not only beautiful to behold but the very hope of our future.

PH NatCom works on the PH ratification of the UNESCO 2005 Convention

Last 29 June 2018, PH NatCom hosted an inter-agency workshop on the UNESCO 2005 Convention on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. The 2005 Convention is essentially a response to the cultural imperialism of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In the words of PH NatCom Secretary General Lila Shahani, “many UN member states are balking at the hegemonies of Hollywood, Bollywood, K-Pop, and Silicone Valley, to name just a few cultural whirlwinds that flood our markets. Why not let Filipino independent films be more available in the Philippines and elsewhere, for example? How do we support our artists more, especially when they are indigenous peoples who are already the bearers of intangible cultural heritage in their respective communities? Because they are also individual creators, distributors and consumers of a wide variety of cultural expressions in the global market. How are their intellectual property rights then to be respected? And, for that matter, where does a community begin and how does it end, and who is culturally equipped to give them adequate representation? How do we balance culture, on the one hand, and trade, on the other, which is dominated by capitalist markets? While the notion of the creative economy -- where the economic dimension of culture is explored, along with its livelihood-generating capacities -- is deeply positive, when does it become fraught? When we coopt creativity into the market, do we then do an injustice to its sources? What is the distinction between cultural inspiration and cultural appropriation? Finally, given the lack of equity that defines globalization itself, how do we negotiate around it?” PH NatCom was pleased to have a UNESCO expert, Ms. Anupama Sekhar lecture to the country team. Many other partners from the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), National Commission on Culture and the Arts (NCCA), Intellectual Property Office (IPO Phil), Design Center of the Philippines (DCP), Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), British Council, and DFA-UNIO, joined the workshop.

Philippines attends the 5th Interregional Meeting for UNESCO National Commissions

PH NatCom Secretary General Lila Ramos Shahani represented the Philippines during the 5th interregional meeting for UNESCO National Commissions held in Diani, Kenya. It was a meaningful gathering of all UNESCO Secretaries General who shared the frustrations and difficulties in their respective countries, and also their many goals and aspirations. 5 Vice-Chairs were chosen for this conference, representing Africa, the Arab States, Europe and North America, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Asia-Pacific region. She was deeply honored and humbled to have been chosen to represent the Asia-Pacific, which spans such heterogenous countries as Cambodia, Pakistan, Fiji, Iran, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, Mongolia, Nepal, South Korea, Singapore, China, Indonesia, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Tonga and Vanuatu, among others. In this sense, the Asia-Pacific is very different from other regions, who have strong linguistic, religious and cultural ties with one another, so it was particularly fulfilling to sit down, break bread and try to speak with one voice as a region. In the end, the Asia-Pacific member states gave some excellent recommendations to help strengthen UNESCO and its efforts towards a Strategic Transformation.  

Culion Leprosy Archives designated as one of Asia-Pacific’s most important documentary collections

The United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Memory of the World Committee for Asia and the Pacific (MOWCAP) inscribed the Culion Leprosy Archives to the MOWCAP Regional Register during its 8th General Meeting in Gwangju, Republic of Korea last 30 May 2018. Housed at the Culion Museum and Archives in Culion, Palawan, the Culion Leprosy Archives boast of a wide collection of rare journals and reference materials on leprosy, as well as clinical records and letters of the island’s residents since 1906. The Archives also feature publications such as the International Journal of Leprosy and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, of which the first editor-in-chief was Dr. Windsor Wade. The Culion Leprosy Archives garnered a majority vote from the 28-member MOWCAP after having been strongly recommended by the MOWCAP Register Sub-Committee for inscription. Dr. Arturo Cunanan, Chief, Culion Sanitarium and General Hospital (CSGH), spearheaded the nomination of the Archives with the support of the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP) and the facilitation of the UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines (UNACOM). The Archives are the second documentary collection to be inscribed from the Philippines after the inscription of the Presidential Papers of Manuel L. Quezon in 2010. The Regional Register also includes Cambodia’s Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum Archive, Australia’s Landmark Constitutional Documents of the Commonwealth of Australia, Fiji’s Polynesian Immigrants Records from 1876-1914, and Viet Nam’s Royal Literature on Hue Royal Architecture (1802-1945), among others. In addition to being part of a prestigious list of documents and archives, inscription also allows documentary heritage workers and custodians to become part of an active community that advocates for the preservation of, and access to, documentary heritage. Inscription has also helped custodians and Member States promote, publicize and pool resources to maintain collections. The Philippine Delegation to the 8th General Meeting of MOWCAP was composed of Prof. Nick Deocampo, Chairperson, Philippine National Committee for MOW; Dr. Rene Escalante, Chairperson, NHCP and Ms. Joana Rizza Bagano, Programme Officer, UNACOM. The Philippine National Committee for MOW envisions increased promotion of Philippine documentary heritage and more inscriptions to the National, Regional, and International MOW Registers.

PH NatCom conducts Education for Sustainable Development Youth Leadership Training

55 youth leaders all over the Philippines participated in the Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Youth Leadership Training last 12 February 2018 at the Department of Foreign Affairs in Pasay City. UNESCO, through the Global Action Programme, has been dedicated to generating and scaling up ESD action at all levels and areas of education. Last November 2017, the Philippines had been selected to take part in the Asia Pacific ESD Leadership Training organized by UNESCO in Asia and the Pacific, Goi Foundation, and Earth Charter International. As one of its commitments to the Global Action Programme on ESD, PH NatCom mobilized promising young leaders and student/teacher advocates all over the Philippines to introduce the ESD programme. Among the organizations present were representatives from the National Association of UNESCO Clubs in the Philippines, member schools of the Associated Schools Project Network, 2030 Youth Force in the Philippines, National Youth Parliament, and student advocates from various universities in the Philippines. At the end of the one-day leadership training, the participants readily committed to join the ESD Philippine Network of Youth Leaders established by PH NatCom. To date, the network has yet to map out the succeeding projects and activities to promote ESD in the Philippines.

39th General Conference

The UNESCO General Conference (GenCon) consists of the representatives of the Member States of UNESCO (or the Organization). It meets every two years and is attended by Member States and Associate Members, together with observers from non-Member States, inter-governmental organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The 39th GenCon brought together the Organization’s Member States, which determined UNESCO’s budget and the direction of its programmes and activities for the next two years. Heads of State attended UNESCO’s Leaders Forum, which had the theme “Sustainable Development and UNESCO’s Role in the Multilateral System.” Some 200 government ministers, mostly education and culture ministers, also attended the General Conference. The Philippine Delegation was headed by Department of Education Secretary Leonor Briones,  and attended by National Commission for Culture and Arts Chair Virgilio Almario, Department of Science and Technology Undersecretary Renato Solidum Jr., Philippine Ambassador to France Teresa Lazaro and PH NatCom Secretary General Lila Ramos Shahani. Various side events were conducted, with presentations and debates on key issues in each of UNESCO’s fields of competence: education, science and technology, social and human sciences, communication and information, and culture.

Fourth Inter-Regional Meeting of National Commissions for UNESCO

The Fourth Inter-Regional Meeting of National Commissions held last 27 October 2017 in Paris convened over 200 participants representing the 137 Member States/Associate Members and 21 Field Offices of UNESCO. PH NatCom was represented by Secretary General Lila Ramos Shahani, Ms. Michelle Dulay and Ms. Josefina Escueta. During its sessions, UNESCO recognized the roles and efforts of National Commissions in ensuring the effective implementation on the ground of SDGs and other UNESCO programmes and projects. It also touched on the regulatory frameworks regarding UNESCO-affiliated associations, centres and clubs. Most importantly, the meeting highlighted the need to strengthen National Commissions in coordinating UNESCO programmes and expanding their cooperation with UNESCO Headquarters in Paris, as well as with other National Commissions. Outgoing UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova delivered the closing remarks, where she extended her appreciation to all the UNESCO National Commissions present.